Uk
US home foreclosures continuing to fall, latest data shows
Foreclosures in the United States are continuing to decline with the latest data showing they fell 30% in December year on year, the sixth consecutive month with an annual decrease in foreclosure starts. However, the figures from real estate data firm RealtyTrac also shows that bank repossessions (REOs) in December increased 65% from a year ago, the 10thconsecutive month with an annual increase in REOs. ‘In 2015 we saw a return to normal, healthy foreclosure activity in many markets even as banks continued to clean up some of the last vestiges of distress left over from the last housing crisis,’ said Daren Blomquist, vice president of RealtyTrac. ‘The increase in bank repossessions that we saw for the year was evidence of this clean up phase, which largely involves completing foreclosure on highly distressed, low value properties,’ he explained. ‘Meanwhile, local economic problems became a larger driver of foreclosure activity in 2015 Examples of this are Atlantic City, New Jersey, which posted the nation’s highest metro foreclosure rate for the year, along with several heavy oil-producing markets in Texas and Oklahoma where foreclosure activity increased in 2015, counter to the national trend,’ he added. Counter to the national trend, 24 states and the District of Columbia posted an increase in foreclosure activity in 2015 compared to 2014, including Massachusetts up 55%, Missouri up 50%, Oklahoma up 36%, New York up 24% and Texas up 16%. Among the nation’s 20 largest metro areas, six posted year on year increases in foreclosure activity in 2015. In Boson they were up 44%, up 38% in St. Louis, up 25% in Dallas, up 22% in Detroit, up 9% in New York and up less than 1% in Houston. A total of 569,835 properties started the foreclosure process in 2015, down 11% from 2014 and down 73% from the peak of more than 2.1 million foreclosure starts in 2009 to a 10 year low. Bucking the national trend, foreclosure starts increased in 2015 in 16 states, including Oklahoma up 92%, Massachusetts up 67%, Missouri up 28%, Virginia up 23%, Nevada up 14% and Arkansas up 14%. A total of 449,900 properties were repossessed by lenders in 2015, up 38% from 2014 but still 57% below the peak of nearly 1.1 million bank repossessions (REOs) in 2010. The median price of a bank owned home in 2015 was 41% below the median price of all homes, the biggest bank owned discount nationwide since 2006. ‘That may be surprising to some, but demonstrates that in a healthy real estate market foreclosures are no longer mainstream, but instead are back to being a market niche of properties with problems that many buyers do not want to tackle,’ said Blomquist. Bank repossessions (REOs) increased from a year ago in 41 states and the District of Columbia. Some of the biggest increases were in New Jersey which was up 226%, New York up 194%, Texas up 115%, North Carolina up 108%, and Oregon up 96%. Foreclosures in… Continue reading
Location is still the top consideration when buying a home in the UK
The old cliché location, location, location when it comes to buying a home is still relevant with new research showing it is the top reason for buyers making up their mind. More than half, 56% of British people make an offer on a home because they fall in love with it with location, price and garden the top three reasons for doing so. Being close to friends is the least important factor when choosing the location of a property with only 9% of buyers saying so, according to the research from conveyancing services firm My Home Move. Some 58% cited location as the top characteristic that made them fall in love with their home, 37% said it was price and 29% said it was the garden. When it comes to that all important location some 40% said transport links were important, 35% said a green area nearby and 32% said being near to shops, cafes and restaurants. Women are more likely to base their decision on being close to family at 32% compared to 26% of men yet both genders list being close to friends as the least important factor, shared by only 9%. For those in their 20s, having a nearby school and being in an up and coming area ranked in joint second place, with 34% saying these factors were important. This suggests that the younger age group are planning ahead, as well as looking to settle in an area that has investment potential as it shifts from being on the cusp of gentrification, to a sought after location. Location is also the most important factor in putting people off a property with 43% said a bad location would mean not buying a property. Some 40% would be put off a home that as too expensive and 34% by the appearance of the property. Younger home owners aged between 21 and 30 were less put off by the location, with only 37% citing this. However this age group tends to be more limited on choice due to job location and affordability issues than older Brits. ‘For most people, location is the secret ingredient that makes them fall in or out of love with their home. People also love a bargain, which explains why cost was the second most important factor in making someone fall in love with their home,’ said Doug Crawford, chief executive officer of My Home Move. ‘As house prices continue to climb and many first time buyers struggle to take their first step onto the property ladder, younger buyers are more willing to scout out up and coming areas to try and find a bargain to fall in love with,’ he explained. ‘Unfortunately, not all of those buying a home have the flexibility to pick and choose their ideal location or perfect interiors, especially as demand continues to outstrip supply. Compromise may have to become… Continue reading
CML warns of negative impact of new 3% tax on second homes on UK housing market
The UK property market is facing a slowdown in buy to let activity due to tax changes for private landlords, says a submission to the Treasury over the extra surcharge on second properties. The Council of Mortgage Lenders is urging reform of the plans to charge an extra 3% for buy to let landlords and second home buyers from April this year to mitigate potentially negative impacts on the housing market as a whole. It says in its submission that even without the new surcharge, the forthcoming adverse tax changes for private landlords and the potential macro prudential interventions in the buy to let market will result in a slowdown. It points out that there is a risk of overkill in dampening investor sentiment to the extent that the flow of available private rented property could be disrupted, without any necessarily corresponding increase in the ability of households to become home owners. In addition, with around a fifth of households currently renting in the private sector, there is the perverse risk that the stamp duty increase could cause landlords to charge higher rents, and so actually make it harder for tenants who want to buy to save the deposit needed to do so. Under current proposals, some people will be caught by the requirement to pay the 3% surcharge even when they are buying their main residence, for example, if they have a short term overlap between owning their previous home and acquiring their new one, perhaps as a result of problems in the housing chain, the CML points out. ‘It would be better to allow people to defer their payment of stamp duty for 18 months subject to conditions, rather than require them to pay it upfront and then potentially reclaim it in the form of a rebate. This would be both fairer and more efficient,’ the submission says. ‘The government should clarify whether its policy intention is to favour institutions facilitating new build activity, or new build activity more generally. If the policy focus is on the perceived benefit arising from the economic activity, then the proposal should recognise the potential for even small scale and individual investors to contribute to this through off-plan purchases, and should not discriminate against them,’ it adds. Director general Paul Smee said that the CML’s longstanding view is that stamp duty is a blunt policy lever. ‘Given the complexity of the proposals, we also suspect that in practical terms the surcharge could cause more problems than it solves,’ he pointed out. ‘We urge the government at least to move away from a position where people will have to pay and then potentially claim back to one where payment is deferred, and only triggered if the buyer genuinely falls into the intended target category,’ he explained. ‘If the surcharge proposal is designed to promote home ownership, we think that there should be better evidence as to why this requires a reversal of growth in the private rented sector,’… Continue reading
