Investment
High proportion of UK landlords considering ways to combat tax change
Some 40% of landlords in the UK are either seriously considering forming a limited company in order to limit their exposure to changes that will restrict mortgage interest or will be looking into the option in the coming months, according to new research. However, the research from the National Landlords Association (NLA) found that so far only 1% had actually incorporated, which the NLA says can be explained by the high cost of transferring property held personally into a company. The findings also show that 31% have no intention of moving their portfolio to a limited company and that 29% are still unsure about whether they will incorporate or not. Mortgage interest relief for individual residential landlords, which will be restricted to the basic rate of income tax of 20% by 2021, will begin to be phased back from April 2017. The changes will mean that landlords will no longer be able to deduct the cost of mortgage interest before declaring their taxable profit, and will instead receive a tax credit of 20% of their mortgage interest costs. The NLA has labelled the changes the Turnover Tax, because landlords’ tax will be calculated on rental income they earn, rather than their profits, forcing many basic rate payers into a higher bracket and leaving higher and additional rate payers with considerably bigger tax bills. Landlords structured as companies will be exempt from the changes, instead paying corporation tax, currently 20%, on their profits alone. ‘Transferring personally held property to a limited company isn’t a straightforward process, so it’s not surprising that so few have taken this action so far. Landlords need to do their research but many will realise that incorporating simply doesn’t stack up financially; doing so will incur capital gains and potential stamp duty charges, which means the process may be prohibitively expensive,’ said Richard Lambert, NLA chief executive officer. According to Richard Price, executive director of the UK Association of Letting Agents (UKALA), if landlords follow through with these intentions then it’s likely that more and more will take a hands on approach to managing their portfolios in the future, which would mean less business to go around for agents, and certainly less of a need for full service offerings. ‘The changes to taxation are forcing landlords to re-evaluate their businesses and their place in the market, so our advice for agents is to begin talking to your clients about their intentions over the next few years, and consider how you’ll meet their changing needs in a way that is distinct from your rivals,’ he pointed out. Continue reading
Female property professionals in UK still paid less than men
Salaries for UK property professionals have continued to rise at an average increase of 7.1% in 2016 but there is still a gender pay gap, according to the latest survey, with men earning £7,000 a year more than women. The survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and Macdonald & Company shows that male property professionals earn £57,509 a year compared to their female counterparts on £45,689. It means that the gender pay gap has closed slightly from 27% last year to 25.9% in 2016, the discrepancy is evident across all age groups and is most acute for those aged 18 to 22 where the difference in average salary is 28.7%. The report also says that competition for talent continues with the average salary increase awarded to respondents who moved employer in the last year reached 16.2%, while the average increase received by respondents under 30 jumped by 12%. Bonuses awarded to entry level candidates jumped by 79% this year and employees at this level are also most likely to move job and of those who indicated they are likely to look to change roles this year 35% are relatively inexperienced, compared to 19% last year. ‘The fact that 64% of respondents reported a rise in salary will offer cold comfort to the many women in the sector, especially those at entry level, who are once again confronted with a significant gender pay gap. The industry must urgently take action to create a more balanced workforce that attracts the best talent if it wants to remain competitive,’ said RICS equalities manager Justine Wallis-Leggett. ‘We can achieve this by introducing inclusive working practices such as flexible working. These are key to employee engagement, and in an increasingly competitive market, employers cannot afford to create working environments that only serve the needs of a small majority of the workforce,’ she added. She pointed out that RICS has launched an Inclusive Employer Quality Mark which asks employers to put inclusivity at the heart of what they do, and aims to support them in sharing best practice. ‘We would urge all firms to put their money where their mouth is by signing up. Until there is a true commitment to change within the sector, we will continue to see results like these and the subsequent drift of talent away from our sector,’ Wallis-Leggett explained. Looking at the picture across the UK, those working in greater London continue to earn, on average, the most at £65,050 and command a premium of 20.8% over the South East and 52.2% over Ireland. The majority of the rest of the UK have indicated only a slight growth in average annual salaries, with the greatest growth seen in Scotland with a rise of 2% and the Midlands up 1%. RICS qualifications continue to show their merit with a FRICS earning £69,885 in comparison to a non RICS counterpart at £43,905, while those with… Continue reading
UK government criticised for having a short term approach to new home building
The wave of new home building in the UK could harm the longer term housing market as sustainability, design, quality and planning risk being pushed aside in the rush to build new properties, it is claimed. A new report from the House of Lords Built Environment Select Committee Report outlines concerns that the short term approach to building new homes is being carried out at the expense of long term considerations, and criticises the removal of initiatives such as zero carbon homes. It points out that the planning, design, management and maintenance of the built environment has a long term impact upon people and communities and that policy towards the built environment in England should not be the sole preserve of any one Government department. ‘There is an urgent need to co-ordinate and reconcile policy across numerous different areas and priorities. Recently, however, one priority has become dominant in debates concerning built environment policy. Increasing the overall supply of housing, and the speed at which housing is delivered, is a central part of the Government’s policy agenda,’ the report says. ‘When seen in the context of the housing crisis facing many communities across England, this is understandable and, overall, we welcome the Government focus on increasing and speeding up the supply of housing,’ it explains. ‘Restrictions on financial freedoms and flexibilities, however, pose a threat to the ability of local authorities to build houses of their own. The private sector, throughout the post-war period, has very rarely achieved the delivery of 200,000 homes a year. We do not believe the Government can deliver the step change required for housing supply without taking measures to allow local authorities and housing associations each to play their full part in delivering new homes,’ it adds. The report also says that Government initiatives have so far failed to address a further part of the house building problem, which is the gap between planning permissions granted and new homes built. ‘We recommend measures intended to address this, and other, barriers to increasing the number of housing completions. More fundamentally, however, we are concerned that the overall emphasis on speed and quantity of housing supply appears to threaten place making itself, along with sustainable planning for the long-term and the delivery of high quality and design standards,’ the report says. ‘The Government is pursuing a deregulatory agenda as seen, for example, in the introduction of more flexible arrangements for office to residential conversions and the strong policy emphasis placed on the financial viability of new developments. These… Continue reading
