Tag Archives: javascript
EM Storms Could Spread To Europe
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/03acf9f0-098b-11e3-8b32-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2cXAczb6b By Ralph Atkins in London Periphery eurozone bond markets could be next in line for sell-off At the start of this year, emerging market turmoil was on few investors’ worry lists. Top preoccupations were US fiscal woes, the rumbling eurozone debt crisis and a possible “hard” landing for China’s economy. Nobody really considered what would happen if all those threats did not materialise. The financial storms hitting India and other developing economies this week are the answer. With the US economy having successfully avoided possible global upsets and growing steadily, the US Federal Reserve wants to wind down its asset purchases, or “quantitative easing”, from as early as next month. As a result bond prices have fallen, and yields risen correspondingly, in developed markets – and the strong flows of capital into emerging markets that had been attracted by higher yields there have gone firmly into reverse. Worst hit have been countries most reliant on capital inflows – those with gaping current account deficits to finance. In India, where the deficit exceeded 5 per cent of gross domestic product last year, the rupee has tumbled to a record low against the dollar. Equity prices have fallen precipitously, while 10-year bond yields have approached 10 per cent, the highest for five years. The good news is that this has not yet spun into a full-blown emerging market crisis, and the Fed can control the pace at which it “tapers” asset purchases. European shares are benefiting as an alternative contrarian trade for investors looking for underrated assets. The bad news is that we are still at the start of the process of exiting global QE and the effects will spread – including, perhaps, to weaker European economies. Much of what is happening in emerging markets is the result of national factors – India’s troubles have been exacerbated by seemingly cack-handed political decisions. It is also true that global investors fell out of love with emerging market equities long before Ben Bernanke, Fed chairman, first hinted at tapering on May 22. Thus the extent to which tapering is causing the emerging market tensions is disputed. But it seems obvious that tapering talk has at least exacerbated the sell-off. Outflows from Bric (Brazil, Russia, India and China) bond funds have been equivalent to almost a third of assets under management since May 22, according to EPFR, a funds data provider. That compares with just 4 per cent from the start of the year until Mr Bernanke spoke. Moreover, there has been a clear relationship between the size of current account deficits and the extent to which countries have been hit by the financial turmoil – strengthening the argument that it is reversed QE flows that are the main culprit. Indonesia, where the current account also deteriorated sharply last year, has seen some of the sharpest equity price falls. South Africa, Turkey and Brazil have, like India, seen steep rises in bond yields and tumbling dollar exchange rates. Ominously, the lesson of economic history is that when capital inflows go into reverse, the turnround is often abrupt and painful. Nor are surplus countries immune. When emerging market fund managers have to finance sudden large outflows they are forced to sell higher-quality, more liquid assets – and the effects spread. For Europeans, this week’s events are eerily reminiscent of the damage wreaked on the Baltic states that were running massive current account deficits when the global financial crisis erupted in 2007. Eurozone bond yields have remained steady for the (not entirely positive) reason that fickle foreign investors have already fled the region’s weakest markets. For a while, weaker members of the eurozone were protected by the currency union. But then the eurozone itself was almost torn apart as strong capital flows from the continent’s north to the southern periphery went into reverse. Fixed exchange rate regimes sometimes lull investors into a false sense of security by delaying an inevitable correction. This week’s emerging market turmoil will encourage the shift in investor sentiment back towards developed economies, especially those returning to internally driven, self-sustaining growth. The risk for Europe, however, is that periphery eurozone bond markets could be next in line for a sell-off. If German 10-year Bund yields are rising – they have this week exceeded 1.9 per cent, compared with less than 1.2 per cent in early May – yields below 4.5 per cent on Italian and Spanish equivalents look less compelling. For now, eurozone bond yields have remained steady for the (not entirely positive) reason that fickle foreign investors have already fled the region’s weakest markets. But we are at the start of a long process in which US monetary policy will evolve – with effects nobody can predict with confidence. Continue reading
The Elbert Files: Now Is The Time To Sell Farmland
BY DAVE ELBERT , Columnist Friday, August 09, 2013 7:00 AM Iowa’s farm economy is at a tipping point. This won’t be a collapse, like the farm crisis of 30 years ago, when farmland lost 60 percent of its value and many farm families were put off their land. But there are growing signs that the farm economy has peaked. And if it has, the effects will be felt well beyond the farm gate. In recent years, record-high crop prices boosted Iowa’s per capita income growth to levels well above the national average, as well as state income tax collections. “Indeed, it is in the cards” that a decade of growth in farm income is coming to an end, said Neil Harl, Iowa’s premier agricultural expert. “These spikes never last forever,” Harl said last week. “Farmers are the world’s best economic citizens. Give them half an economic incentive, and they increase production every time and drive the price down, and destroy their own economic prosperity.” That is what is happening now. Corn and soybean prices reached record levels for the month of January, but they are now down significantly. Crop prices can, and do, fluctuate during the growing season. But the trend this year is abnormal. In recent years, crop prices have typically increased during the late spring and early summer months, based in part on early flooding and drought fears. Then in late summer and early fall, prices fell when government reports predicted larger-than-expected harvests due to advances in plant genetics, changing weather patterns and other factors. But this year, Iowa’s corn and soybean prices are bucking that trend. Corn prices are down 30 percent from January, while soybeans are down 15 percent. In the past 30 years, there have been only three other times – 1975, 1994 and 1999 – when both corn and soybeans posted double-digit price declines between January and July. In two cases, 1975 and 1994, year-end prices wound up being even lower than the July averages. Those earlier events occurred before significant genetic advances created drought-tolerant and fast-growing crops capable of making up the difference when planting is delayed by spring flooding. No one can predict with certainty what will happen this year, but at this point, it is unlikely that prices will recover to last year’s record levels. If corn and soybean prices remain where they are now, they would chop roughly $4 billion off the value of Iowa crops that sold for more than $20 billion last year. Indeed, current prices are more in line with 2010, which was also a good year for farm income, although not as good as the two years that followed. The problem today – and it’s not a bad problem to have – is that the bar of expectations has been repeatedly raised in recent years. Expectations are a big driver in farmland sales, pushing up land values by leaps and bounds not seen since the years that preceded the 1980s farm crisis. Harl and others say a 1980s-style crash is unlikely for a variety of reasons. But the question remains, have farmland values peaked? “We haven’t seen it yet,” said Steve Bruere, president of Clive-based Peoples Co., a major broker of farm sales. But he added, most farmland sales occur between September and March. “There is still so much money in checking accounts, and land values always lag going down,” Bruere said. Another factor, he said, is “interest rates have jumped about 1 percent.” “Eventually, the combination of lower prices and (higher) interest rates will affect land values,” Bruere said. If you own farmland and want to sell at the peak, now is probably a good time. Read more: http://www.businessr…6#ixzz2cPXNPHGh Continue reading
Upbeat Deere Farm Takings Number Puzzles Investors
14 th Aug 2013, by Agrimoney.com US farmers’ cash takings are to remain at an “excellent level” despite tumbling in crop values, Deere & Co said, remaining sanguine on European farm finances too – but acknowledging some setbacks to former Soviet Union customers. Deere & Co, at an investor meeting after announcing better-than-expected quarterly profits, faced a barrage of questions over forecasts that US farmers’ cash receipts will fall by only $10.1bn, or 2.6%, in 2014 to $379.7bn, remaining “historically high”. Deere forecasts for US 2014 cash receipts, and (change on year) 2014 receipts: $379.7bn, (-$10.1bn) Comprising – Crops: $198.3bn, (-$6.5bn) Livestock: $170.3bn, (-$1.4bn) Gov. payouts: $11.1bn, (-$0.2bn) 2013 receipts: $389.8bn 2012 receipts: $402.1bn 2011 receipts: $384.7bn Barclays analyst Andrew Kaplowitz said that while Deere was “usually pretty conservative” with forecasts, “if I talked to bears out there on ag, they would say that your forecast looks not conservative at all”. Larry de Maria at William Blair asked why Deere, while utilising larger crop estimates than the USDA, was using similar price forecasts, when a large crop might imply weaker values, with Bank of America, Credit Suisse and JP Morgan analysts also questioning the receipts forecast. The cash receipts number is particularly important for agricultural machinery investors, in being closely correlated with equipment demand. Susan Karlix, Deere’s manager of investor communications, saying that cash receipts “are expected to remain at an excellent level, helping keep farmers in a financially sound position”, termed them “the number one predictor of farm equipment sales”. Volume and price However, Marie Ziegler, Deere’s deputy financial officer, strongly defended the estimate, saying that “at this stage of the game this is our best forecast”, flagging the role of strong crops in making up for lower prices. “Remember that cash receipts is a function of quantity, which will be very good this year, in addition to price,” she said. “Cash receipts doesn’t discriminate between the commodity price and the quantity.” Tony Huegel, Deere investor relations director, said that the Deere estimates had been put together before the USDA’s numbers on Monday. And while $4.90 a bushel was historically “very strong pricing” for corn, even with prices in the low-$4s a bushel, “farmers are still making good money”. Arable vs dairy Deere was sanguine over the impact of lower crop prices on European Union agricultural finances too, saying that while “arable farm income is weakening”, it “remains at supportive levels”. Furthermore, “improving milk prices will support dairy farmers”, with prices in the UK hitting a record 30.77p per litre in June and, in the EU as a whole, butter values last month standing 57% higher than a year before, with skim milk powder up by more than 40%. However, Deere acknowledged some dent to prospects in the growing former Soviet Union market from tight credit and some crop setbacks. “Hot, dry weather has impacted crop prospects in southern Russia and Ukraine, and credit availability is also hurting equipment demand,” Ms Karlix said. With import duties also weighing on combine demand, Deere nudged down to “moderately lower”, from “down slightly”, its forecast for farm machinery industry demand in the former Soviet Union this year. Continue reading




