Tag Archives: green

Wood Panel Firm Slammed For ‘Opportunistic’ Anti-Biomass Ads

6 June 2013 Ads placed by Norbord attack biomass subsidies A wood panel maker that placed adverts campaigning against biomass subsidies has been accused of opportunism, as it continues to profit in the UK. Norbord is behind a series of ads claiming that subsidised energy generators are able to pay “more than double” the price paid by manufacturers for wood. That has driven up UK prices 60 per cent in the last five years, it claims. The biomass industry prefers to cite official statistics from the Forestry Commission showing that over the past twenty years, average timber prices have fallen by 29 to 42 per cent in real terms. Norbord’s financial results show its profits are up, increasing more than fivefold to the first quarter of 2013 from the same period last year. The Canadian-based company expects stable performance of its European business, which includes three UK factories. Richard Crowhurst, editor of Enagri BioenergyWeekly, which highlighted the figures, said: “With such a large rise in its profits and European output at a time when UK timber prices are falling and forestry investors are losing money on their day-to-day activities, the fact that Norbord Inc. is lobbying MPs and the public to oppose the use of biomass to generate low carbon renewable energy on the grounds that it raises wood prices is at best opportunistic and at worst deeply cynical.” The Norbord campaign also cites a joint report published by the RSPB, Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace last November that claimed burning biomass could be more environmentally damaging than coal. The “Dirtier than Coal?” findings were rejected by the government and widely criticised at the time for extrapolating from an unrealistic worst-case scenario. Source: Utility Week Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Wood Panel Firm Slammed For ‘Opportunistic’ Anti-Biomass Ads

Gold Standard Seeks Comments As It Expands Forest Carbon Palette

Author: Gloria Gonzalez Until late last year, the Gold Standard seemed happy to serve as a go-to standard for renewable energy and energy efficiency offsets while watching the Verified Carbon Standard take a dominant position in land-based offsets. Now the Gold Standard is seeking input from participants as it expands its land-based coverage, beginning with Afforestation/Reforestation. 5 June 2013 | Reflecting its origins in the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism and stewardship by the once-anti-forest-carbon WWF, the Gold Standard covers just one segment of the forest carbon spectrum – Afforestion/Reforestation (A/R). But it boosted its coverage with last year’s acquisition of the CarbonFix standard , and now the traditionally energy-facing standard is requesting input on its new and improved draft A/R requirements and guidelines while preparing to expand into agroforestry, improved forest management, improved livestock management and climate-smart agriculture. You can offer comments here . A/R commenting will close on June 28, and the requirements are expected to be published in August 2013 and road tested for six months. Initial projects using the framework will be in the voluntary carbon markets, but existing projects from other standards or from compliance markets can seek Gold Standard certification if they meet the requirements. The forestry sector has an average annual biophysical mitigation potential of 5.4 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO 2 e) until 2050, according to the IPCC Third Assessment Report, and  the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) is currently the most popular standard applied to A/R projects. The Gold Standard’s framework pursues permanent carbon reductions by requiring an independent assessment of the full project design during the design phase to ensure that the expected climate benefits and sustainable development objectives are feasible. The organization will also require dual monitoring and verification of the carbon performance and sustainable implementation of all projects, including an independent audit of a project’s sustainable development indicators and risk mitigation measures at least every five years. The Gold Standard will also put in place a compliance mechanism to deal with unexpected complications, including a guarantee through its new compliance reserve that every carbon dioxide certificate represents a tonne of Gold Standard carbon reduction. The compliance reserve is a “last resort” as Gold Standard projects must first undergo rigorous certification of their safeguards and sustainable development both at the design phase and during the lifetime of the project, according to the organization. A key challenge for the Gold Standard in developing the framework is that land use and forests carbon projects typically have long-range planning horizons and need to be sustainable over multiple decades. “Mandating, for example, a century of project monitoring is unrealistic, even dangerous as it focuses attention away from what is really needed to make a land use and forests project fundamentally robust,” the organization said in the draft framework document out for public consultation – an apparent reference to California’s Climate Action Reserve (CAR), which requires forest owners to monitor and verify a project for a period of 100 years following the issuance of Climate Reserve Tonnes (CRT) for greenhouse gas reductions or removals achieved by the project. The CarbonFix Acquisition The Gold Standard extended its reach into the land use and forest space via its September 2012 acquisition of the CarbonFix Standard. The Gold Standard’s A/R requirements – the actual methodology and rules for A/R projects as opposed to the broader framework – leverage about 80% of their content from the CarbonFix methodology while another 20% of the framework was added or updated according to Gold Standard specifications, explains Tanya Petersen, director of marketing and communications for the Gold Standard. Existing CarbonFix projects will need to provide evidence that they meet the additional “20%” of the methodology that reflects Gold Standard requirements, and comply with other Gold Standard rules, such as a more prescriptive stakeholder consultation, during the project cycle. But all CarbonFix projects are expected to be able to make the transition, she said. There are currently 12 CarbonFix projects which over time ex-ante have generated a total volume of about 6 million tonnes of carbon offsets. Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Gold Standard Seeks Comments As It Expands Forest Carbon Palette

Worry Over Scarcer Credits Propels US Carbon Market RGGI

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/25cf4754-cfb6-11e2-a050-00144feab7de.html#ixzz2VuVXa62r June 9, 2013 11:52 pm Worry over scarcer credits propels US carbon market RGGI By Gregory Meyer in New York and Pilita Clark in London A pioneer US carbon market is climbing after an intervention meant to grapple with a surplus of credits that has also dogged Europe’s emissions trading system. Last week’s quarterly auction by the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, operated by nine northeast states, was twice oversubscribed. The clearing price of $3.21 per short tonne was the highest in four years. Companies on a list of potential bidders included energy traders EDF Trading, Koch, Mercuria and Vitol as well as Morgan Stanley, the Wall Street bank. The programme began in 2009 as a means to reduce emissions in states including Massachusetts, Maryland and New York. Power plants of 25 megawatts or larger must purchase a permit for each short tonne of carbon dioxide produced. But prices plunged as financial crisis damped electricity demand and a shale drilling boom encouraged generators to burn natural gas instead of higher-carbon coal. In February, the states cut the cap on annual emissions by 45 per cent to 91m short tonnes from next year, with 2.5 annual reductions afterward through 2020. Paul Tesoriero, director of environmental markets at Evolution Markets, a New York broker, said anticipation of scarcer credits had lifted prices. “It has everything to do with the rule change,” he said. The policy shift boosted futures markets pegged to credits. RGGI volume at the ICE Futures US exchange more than quadrupled on the year to 4,285 contracts in May. Still, a stockpile of about 100m credits has been banked by traders. This will weigh on prices for years to come, Mr Tesoriero said. In the European Union’s eight-year-old emissions trading system, the largest carbon market in the world, benchmark prices have collapsed to less than €4 a metric tonne, down from more than €30 five years ago, as the weak EU economy exacerbates a glut in the supply of credits. A surplus of about 2bn permits, or roughly a year’s worth of emissions, has built up in the scheme. That is because of weak EU economic conditions – which reduce industrial activity, and therefore demand for permits – and because the EU gave away too many permits for free when the scheme started. The European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, has been trying to approve a plan that would temporarily take 900m tonnes of permits out of the market, and put them back in later when it was hoped demand might be stronger. The measure, known as “backloading”, was rejected by the European Parliament by 334-315 votes in April after business group lobbyists said it would erode EU competitiveness, sending prices down to less than €3. Prices have recovered slightly since then as the parliament prepares for another vote on July 2. “There is some optimism in the market that it could make it through parliament this time, which is definitely pushing prices up,” said carbon analyst Marcus Ferdinand of Thomson Reuters Point Carbon. Even if the backloading plan does pass, however, many analysts believe it will only push prices up by around €2 from what they would have been otherwise. Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, London, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Worry Over Scarcer Credits Propels US Carbon Market RGGI