Tag Archives: alternative

Carbon Credit Trading – A Boon Or A Bane

BY: SHIVANI KHANWILKAR MAY 16, 2013 13:58 Carbon credit generating a $1 billion business in 2012 for India has thrown up huge business opportunities for the developing economy from which emerging business can hugely benefit but tribal societies across the globe are in a dilemma over its market driven mechanisms. India will continue to benefit more and more out of the sale and utilization of Carbon Credits / Certified Emission Reductions (CER), should it be given more clarity from regulatory authorities and incentives by way of more tax subsidies. It was also expected from the 2013 union budget that Section 10 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 be broadened to specifically include exemptions for incomes arising from sale of carbon credit entitlements. Carbon Credits Proposed tax implications on sale of carbon credit / CERs under Direct Tax Code needs to be replaced with a single provision of adequate disclosure on sale or utilization of carbon credit, which will indeed motivate industrial undertakings to contribute more towards corporate social responsibilities and help to protect the environment and natural resources. Recently, Himachal Pradesh became the first state in India to sign an agreement with the World Bank to secure carbon credits under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project for 11 watershed divisions under the Mid-Himalayan Watershed Development Project. The project aim is reforestation in watershed areas, improving livelihoods, and generating carbon revenue for the community. The CDM agreement is estimated to fetch a carbon revenue of at least Rs 20 crore for the first crediting period of 20 years. “The carbon revenue will primarily go to the village community and provide an incentive to protect watershed and forests,” says Rajan Samantraray, World Bank team task leader for the project. The benefit accruing to the community and private landholders is projected to be about Rs 2,500 per hectare, depending on tree growth and other factors. However, there are some people, especially tribal communities, who are opposed to such schemes. Tribal societies around the world are concerned that such schemes, especially its market based driving mechanism, would end up dictating terms to countries on forest management and bypass the poor who depend on forests for a livelihood. Instead of aggressively changing behaviors that emit CO2 and other emissions in the first place, people and companies achieve a feel-good-green state simply by buying carbon offsets. No doubt, the purchase of these offsets funds does help to “reduce, avoid, destroy or sequester” carbon dioxide so that it cannot enter the atmosphere but it defeats the purpose when the offset purchasers are emitting back at home in excessive of what is  traded and the emissions go unchecked. Another criticism is that the voluntary market is highly unregulated and offers much scope for corruption and illegal deals. Unchecked prices are the biggest drawback of these markets. One of the largest emitters of Greenhouse gases happens to be USA, but ironically, till date it has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol, implying that it is not bound by any carbon regulations. Its unregulated emissions only hamper the carbon reduction efforts in other parts of the world. Carbon trading is a system whereby companies that produce carbon emissions, first purchase credits, allowing them to emit a specified amount of carbon into the atmosphere. In effect, this exchange of credits is a trade, in which a firm which has successfully curbed its emissions below the emission quota is in a position to sell some of its carbon credits to a firm which has exceeded its quota or predicts that it will do so in the future. So the earning that a firm makes from selling its credits is like a reward to it for reducing its emissions. On the other hand, the cost of buying credits acts as a penalty for a firm for its inability to limit its emissions to the assigned quota. Carbon credits are increasingly becoming a key component of national and international emissions trading scheme. Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Carbon Credit Trading – A Boon Or A Bane

Farm Ground Prices Increasing

By Brandon Redmond Story Created: May 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM MDT Story Updated: May 15, 2013 at 11:15 PM MDT Twin Falls, Idaho ( KMVT-TV / KTWT-TV ) The price of farm land and farm real estate began increasing in 2011 but it increased even more in 2012. “Back in 2011 when the market was down, things started picking up a little bit and was has happened since now is commodity prices have actually increased which actually increases the farm prices,” said Mark Jones with Robert Jones Realty. The cost for farm real estate has risen twenty to twenty five percent over the past two years. But what does the future hold? “The only thing that I can do is predict what happened in the history. In 2007 the market was on another top of the bubble we would say and that time the commodity prices dropped out and in 2008 we hit, we started going down from farm prices from that point. At this point with our commodity prices still looking fairly good in 2013, we see the prices staying fairly strong for the good quality farm ground,” said Mark Jones. But if commodity prices drop, then the potential is there for farm ground prices to decrease. If you are looking to buy farm real estate, you should contact an agent and get on their list. “The ground that we have. We are low on inventory and they get sold very quickly if they are priced correctly,” said Mark Jones. Jones also told us that now is a great time to sell farm ground. Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Real Estate, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Farm Ground Prices Increasing

Advanced Biofuels Industry Calls For Solid Regulations

15 May 2013 The Leaders of Sustainable Biofuels (LSB) met the European Parliament (EP) in Brussels this May at a meeting hosted by the ITRE (Industry, Research and Energy) Committee. EP VP Alejo Vidal Quadras introduced the positions of the EP ITRE Committee on the European Commission revision of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED). The Leaders sent a clear message to the EP members: ‘Second generation advanced biofuel technologies are ready to compete with conventional biofuels, with companies keen to invest in commercial projects given appropriate conditions.’ Such conditions include a long-term stable legislative framework and specific targets for the use of second generation biofuels. The European advanced biofuel Industry is recognised as one of the technologically advanced in the world via investment companies like those LSB members coupled with support from the European Commission and member states. ‘Now is the time to bring advanced second-generation biofuels to the market,’ says Guido Ghisolfi, chairman of LSB and CEO of Chemtex. ‘The industry is committed to delivering on its promise but we need stable long-term investment conditions which encourage investment while, at the same time, promoting true advanced biofuels. This will have a positive economic as well as ecological impact on the EU.’ Today the  competition in this sector is on the rise and a risk for the EU is that investments will occur in other places where more favourable policies and investment conditions exist, like the US, South America and Asia. The LSB believes a minimum 2% mandate for advanced biofuels should be set as a sub-target of the RED, with a well defined pathway for growth heading toward 2030 by aligning policies with market realities, securing long-term perspectives and mobilising resources into commercial activities. ‘Certification schemes should also be further developed or adapted to respond to the specific characteristics of lignocellulosic fuel chains, particularly when produced from agricultural and forestry residues and wastes,’ the LSB adds. ‘These actions are essential if the EU wants to meet the Climate and Energy Policy targets.’ The LSB is composed by the CEOs of seven European biofuel producers and European airlines: Chemtex, British Airways, BTG, Chemrec, Clariant, Dong Energy and UPM. Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Advanced Biofuels Industry Calls For Solid Regulations