TSI
UK new house building target not over ambitious, analysis suggests
The UK Government’s target of building a million new homes over the next few years is not as ambitious as some may think, according to a new analysis from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). The individual components of the goal includes 200,000 Starter Homes, an initiative still working its way through parliament, and 135,000 shared ownership properties about which little has been said to date. Trying to access the success of such a programme it about the official data on housing starts, according to RICS chief economist Simon Rubinsohn, and these show that a mere 144,000 new units were begun through the course of 2015. But he points out that other data produced by the Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG) casts some doubt on the accuracy of the quarterly figures which are produced on a high frequency basis and released within a short period following the end of the quarter. He explains that there is arguably more value to be gained by focusing on the less frequently released net supply numbers, which are based on completions rather than starts, as they reflect the additions to the stock of housing units for habitation. The quarterly completions series showed an additional 125,000 homes built in 2014/2015, the last full year for which data is available, while the annual net supply series puts completions at 155,000. Rubinsohn adds that net conversions added close to nearly 5,000 additional units over the period and this was supplemented more than 20,000 units from ‘change of use’. The latter figure has increased sharply over the past few years as a result of Permitted Developments Rights enabling the shift from office class to residential. And then demolitions amounted to just over 10,500 in 2014/2015. ‘So pulling this altogether, in the last financial year, there may have been 125,000 housing completions in England, 155,000, just over 180,000 or, after demolitions, 170,000. And on the basis of the higher number (gross additions to supply), the government doesn’t appear that far off its ambition for 2020,’ Rubinsohn argues. ‘None of this is designed to minimise the fundamental nature of the housing crisis which reflects the fact that household formation is still projected to comfortably outstrip projections for the supply of new units even on the most generous calculations,’ he says. ‘This is also clearly visible in the estimates by our professionals for medium term growth in house prices and rents. The February Residential Market Survey suggested both are likely to increase by at least another fifth over the next five years comfortably outstripping the probable rise in wages,’ he adds. Continue reading
Housing affordability falls in Scotland for third year in a row
Rising house prices in Scottish cities has led to a further deterioration in affordability with average values up 3% from £176,009 in 2015 to £181,077 in 2016. This has resulted in average affordability in Scotland’s cities worsening in the last 12 months from 5.25 to 5.36 times gross average annual earnings, the third successive annual decline in affordability. The data from the Bank of Scotland Affordable Cities Review also shows that on average, affordability in Scottish cities is now at its lowest level since 2009 but is still 12% lower than the peak of 6.12 times earnings in 2008 at the height of the last housing market boom. The overall improvement in affordability across Scottish cities as a whole over the past eight years has been driven by a combination of an increase of 10% in the gross average annual earnings and an average house price decline 3%. Edinburgh is Scotland’s least affordable city where the average house price is 6.12 times the gross average earnings in the city. With an average price of £220,099, houses in Edinburgh are more expensive compared with average earnings than in any other Scottish city. Inverness at 6.03, Aberdeen at 5.72, Dundee at 5.38 and Perth at 5.24 make up the top five least affordable cities in Scotland while Stirling is the most affordable city and the second most affordable in the UK with an average property price of £165,658 which is 4.11 times the gross average annual earnings. Glasgow is the second most affordable city in Scotland and 10th in the UK, with an average house price of £159,580, which is 5.07 times the gross average annual earnings in the city. House price growth has been highest in Aberdeen over the past decade and since 2011 Aberdeen has recorded the biggest price rise of any Scottish city over the past decade and with a gain of 58%, is the only Scottish city to appear in the top 10 UK cities with highest house price growth in fifth place. The report explains that this is as a result of rising housing demand due to the strong performance of the oil and gas sector over most of the period. More recently, Aberdeen has seen a 22% rise since 2011 but prices are not declining due to a decline in the resources sector. ‘The rising house prices over the past three years have resulted in a deterioration in home affordability in Scotland’s cities. Although affordability is at the lowest level since 2009, it is still much lower than the height of the last housing market boom in 2008,’ said Nicola Noble, mortgages director at Bank of Scotland. ‘Aberdeen has recorded Scotland’s highest house price growth over the past decade and more recently during the economic recovery, due to strong performance in the oil and gas sector,’ she added. Continue reading
Property price growth eases in Australian capital cities
The rate of residential property price growth in capital cities in Australia eased during the final quarter of 2015, according to the latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The annual growth rate of home prices across Australia’s eight capital cities eased to 8.7% in the final quarter of 2015, driven in part by a deceleration of Sydney dwelling price growth. A breakdown of the data shows that year on year price growth remained strongest in Sydney with prices up 13.9%, followed by Melbourne with growth of 9.6% and Canberra with prices up 6%. In Brisbane prices increased by 4.2%, by 3.5% in Hobart and by 3.3% in Adelaide but prices fell by 3.2% in Darwin and were down by 2.9% in Perth. ‘From an affordability perspective, the slowdown in dwelling price growth to a more sustainable pace is a welcome development,’ said Shane Garrett, senior economist for the Housing Industry Association. He also pointed out that the quarter saw a narrowing of the gap between the capital cities in terms of price growth whereas in previous quarters, the divergence in the pace of price growth from city to city was very large. ‘During 2015, a record 220,000 new dwellings commenced construction across Australia. The additional supply is playing an important role in containing the severe price pressures in markets like Sydney and Melbourne,’ Garrett explained. ‘Ensuring an adequate supply of new housing in the future requires root and branch reform in areas like planning, land supply and the taxation burden on residential building,’ he added. Continue reading
