Dubai
Buying cheaper than renting across whole of UK
Buying is cheaper than renting in every area of the UK, especially in London where rent prices are 56% higher than the average, new research shows. Indeed, potential first time buyers would have lower monthly outgoings if they bought a property than they do renting with average monthly rental prices now surpassing those for the average mortgage repayment. According to the research from Santander Mortgages would be buyers could save themselves £2,300 a year if they were able to purchase their own property. The average monthly rent in the UK is currently £995 per household compared to monthly repayments of £805 for the average first-time buyer household, meaning homeowners could save an average of £190 a month or £2,300 a year. Prospective first time buyers in the South West could make the biggest monthly savings by making the switch from renting to property ownership as average monthly rents exceed mortgage payments by over £192. First time buyers in London would see themselves £179 better off per month. At the other end of the scale are those living in the East of England, where typical first time buyer monthly mortgage payments exceed average rents by only £2. A further breakdown of the figures shows that in Scotland buyers would be £157 better off, in Wales £127, in the North West £121, in Yorkshire and the Humber £113, and in the West Midlands £102. But elsewhere they would be less than £100 better off. In the East Midlands the difference between rent and mortgage was £88, in the North East £83 and in the South East just £28. The research found the average price across the country to be £212,610. This means that a buyer with a 21% deposit, the average deposit size for a UK first time buyer would require £44,648 in order to get on to the property ladder. ‘People assume that buying a property will put them under greater financial pressure, but often the reverse is true. With annual savings averaging well over £2,000, this can really mount up over time and of course once the mortgage is paid off you have a valuable asset to show for it,’ said Miguel Sard, managing director of mortgages at Santander UK. ‘Many prospective first time buyers see the cost of saving for a deposit as prohibitive, but there are many deals available for smaller deposits. Buying a property is a big financial commitment and there are upfront costs to consider, but over the long term the financial benefits can be very significant. Getting independent advice and looking for competitive rates either online or through a mortgage advisor is crucial to get the best mortgage to meet potential home owners individual needs,’ he added. Continue reading
Bling could be back in Dubai property market
Some of the bling that once characterised the Dubai real estate market is set to return with celebrities seeking to build a new breed of luxury villas and over 50 shelved projects being resurrected. From the ordinary buyer and seller perspective some 51 real estate projects valued at AED12 billion are being revived with government backed funding initiatives which means that developers registered with the Dubai Land Department can get building again. Some 12 projects worth AED2 billion are underway and along with others set for starts in 2016 the initiative will see developers like Emaar Properties, Al Wasl and ICD-Brookfield working on projects. To get the funding the projects need to have adequate infrastructure planned or already in place, a properly managed escrow trust account for off plan sales under Dubai real estate law, a technical report showing that at least 60% of the construction is completed and at least 60% of the project has been sold. Meanwhile, the famous Palm Jumeirah is set to be rejuvenated with reports that leading celebrities and wealthy individuals are looking to build luxury villas on the manmade island. This could see a series of lavish Los Angeles style super villas being built, according to property agent Anne Ogilvie, Palm luxury sales specialist at Luxhabitat. She believes that wealthy investors are set to return to Dubai. ‘These end users look to buy plots on the remaining unbuilt fronds in order to build super villas, akin to those in California or Miami. We expect a sizeable number of them to build and then introduce them to the secondary market,’ she said. However, there are a number of issues associated with development on Palm Jumeirah. Some owners are not happy that fees for extensions to their existing villas have increased by 233%. Under the terms and conditions laid out in developer Nakheel’s Guidelines and Procedures for Villa Extension Applications, residents are required to pay an application fee as part of the approval process before they can start construction. According to property experts this means that for an extension of 1,000 square foot an owner would end up paying over $100,000 to Nakheel but on Palm Jumeirah the fee for a 1,000 square foot extension could be over half a million dollars. Continue reading
Sau Paulo has the highest property taxes for real estate investors
As the rate of price growth slows in many global city markets, transaction costs and taxation are becoming increasingly important considerations for investors, a new analysis suggests. With slower price growth forecast in a number of prime city markets, investors are looking more closely at the cost side of the investment equation, according to the report from international real estate firm Knight Frank. While there may be a number of factors behind the choice of location, the research shows that the tax burden across the cities in this report varies considerably both in amount and extent. The tax costs range from as low as 3.5% or 3.6% of the property price in year five in Monaco and Dubai respectively, to over 30% in Sao Paulo. Despite encompassing a wide variety of cities and policies, a number of common themes and trends have arisen throughout the research. For example, in some cities, most notably in Geneva and in Mumbai, there are significant legal restrictions for non-residents who wish to purchase property so it is important to consider these before an investment decision is made. In some jurisdictions, the tax costs are represented primarily by acquisition taxes, notably in Monaco and Dubai, while in most other jurisdictions, tax costs usually comprise acquisition duties payable when purchasing the property; wealth or yearly taxes when holding the property; taxes on rental income, and taxes on disposal of the property, including tax on gains and/or duties at the point of the sale of the property. While in some countries the relative/percentage tax costs are almost equal for both US$1 million and US$10 million properties, in others the tax costs of holding the US$10 million property are almost double those for US$1 million property, the report points out. ‘Finally, it is important to note that some taxes, such as inheritance/gift taxes have not been taken into account in this analysis. Nor were home country taxes. Moreover, we have assumed that investors purchase in their personal name but that might not necessarily be the most efficient from a host or investment country’s tax perspective,’ the report says. However, overall property costs remain largely the same for both a $1 million and $10 million property in many cities such as Sao Paulo, Mumbai and Geneva whilst others see a significant reduction in percentage terms at the $10 million level such as New York and Paris. Reviewing the tax costs across the 15 main cities shows that taxation is highest in Sao Paulo, at both the US$1 million and US$10 million levels, where investors are taxed at 31.5% of the sale value at year five. Hong Kong and Sydney also rank highly. An investor purchasing a US$1 million property in Hong Kong is taxed 22.4%, whilst at the US$10 million level investors in Sydney are taxed 26.0%, in both cases as a percentage of year five price. Monaco offers non-resident investors the lowest rate of tax at 3.5% as a percentage of… Continue reading
