Uk
UK housing repossessions continue downward to record low
Residential property repossessions in the UK, already at their lowest since records began, continued to fall in the second quarter of 2015, according to latest data to be published. In that period, the repossession rate was 0.02%, equivalent to just one in 5,000 mortgages and the data from the Council of Mortgage Lenders also shows that arrears continued to fall as well. Overall there were 2,500 properties taken into possession in the second quarter, down from 3,000 the previous quarter and 5,400 in the second quarter of last year. Of these, 1,800 were in the owner occupier market, and 700 in the buy to let market. However, the CML report points out that as in the first quarter, the current flow of repossessions probably continues to remain lower than the underlying trend would imply, even though arrears are also falling. In terms of arrears, the total number of mortgages with arrears equivalent to 2.5% or more of the mortgage balance was 106,400.This equated to 0.96% of all mortgages, again, the lowest rate since quarterly records began in 2008. CML director general Paul Smee pointed out that this is the first quarter in which the CML has been able to publish fully consistent data on arrears and possessions across both the owner occupier and the buy to let markets. As a result of improvements to the underlying data surveys, some back data has been restated. Of all loans with arrears of more than 2.5% of balance some 100,700 were owner occupier and 5,700 buy to let. In both the owner occupier and buy to let markets, the number and proportion of mortgages in arrears fell or remained static in all arrears bands and none experienced a worsening. Continue reading
Renting a home in the US less affordable than ever, new research suggests
Renting a home in the United States is less affordable than ever before with tenants paying 30% more of their income on paying for their home compared with home owners at 15%, new research shows. Mortgages remain affordable by historical standards while rent is unaffordable in three quarters of housing markets, especially high demand locations in Miami, San Francisco and San Jose, according to the latest report from real estate firm Zillow. It also shows that rental affordability worsened year on year in 28 of the 35 largest metro areas covered by the Zillow index while Denver, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose and San Diego are unaffordable for both renters and buyers. Overall in the second quarter of 2015 renters paid some 30.2% of their monthly income toward rent, the highest percentage ever. Before the real estate downturn tenants could expect to spend about 24.4% of their incomes on rent. In contrast, buyers pay 15.1% of their income towards mortgage payments, which is still less than what they spent historically. From 1985 through 2000, home owners spent about 21.3% of their monthly income on mortgage payments. In Denver and four California metros, both renters and buyers can expect to pay more of their income towards either rent or mortgage payments than in pre-bubble years. In San Jose, renters and buyers should each plan to put about 42% of their incomes towards housing. ‘Our research found that unaffordable rents are making it hard for people to save for a down payment and retirement, and that people whose rent is unaffordable are more likely to skip out on their own healthcare,’ said Zillow chief economist Svenja Gudell. ‘There are good reasons to rent temporarily, for example when moving to a new city, but from an affordability perspective, rents are crazy right now. If you can possibly come up with a down payment, then it's a good time to buy a home and start putting your money toward a mortgage,’ added Gudell. The Zillow report says that mortgage payments will continue to be affordable even if mortgage rates rise as expected. If rates reach 6% next year, home buyers can still expect to spend 30% or less of their income on mortgage payments in 265 out of 290 or 91.4% of the metros Zillow analysed, and mortgage payments will be considered more affordable than in pre-bubble years in 72.1% of metros. Rents, on the other hand, are already unaffordable compared to historic norms in 77% of metros, and with relatively stagnant wage growth, this likely won't improve as rents keep climbing. Continue reading
Half of UK landlords set to be affected by wear and tear tax change
Almost half of landlords in the UK will be affected by the removal of the annual wear and tear allowance announced recently in the summer Budget, research has found. According to new findings from the National Landlords Association (NLA) the change which is due to take effect in April 2016 will affect 47% of landlords. It says that 24% of landlords let their properties fully furnished, 22% are letting a mixture of furnished and unfurnished properties and 53% let their properties on an unfurnished basis. The annual wear and tear allowance is currently available for furnished properties and it will be replaced with a tax relief system that enables all landlords to deduct the costs they actually incur on replacing furnishings in the property. The new system, currently under consultation until the 09 October 2015, will apply from 06 April 2016 for Income Tax purposes and 01 April 2016 for Corporation Tax, and will cover the cost of replacement furniture, furnishings, appliances and kitchenware provided for tenants. This will include movable furniture and furnishings, televisions, fridges and freezers, carpets and flooring, curtains, linen, crockery and cutlery. ‘We fully understand the frustration of those landlords who let exclusively on a furnished basis as the removal of this allowance will very likely represent a reduction in the relief they can claim,’ said Chris Norris, NLA head of policy. ‘However, it will come as a welcome revision for those letting a mixed portfolio, unfurnished, or part furnished property as the replacement system will allow them to deduct legitimate revenue expenses in the future,’ he pointed out. ‘The NLA has broadly welcomed these proposals as it should lead to a fairer system for more landlords. However, as we transition from one system to another, we will push to make sure that any landlords who’ve made recent investments with the expectation of offsetting the cost over a number of years using the current allowance, will not be disadvantaged,’ he added. Continue reading
