Uk
Mortgage lending in UK fell in February month on month, no big change expected
Gross mortgage lending reached £17.6 billion in February, some 5% lower than January but 30% higher than February last year, according to the latest estimates from the Council of Mortgage Lenders. It is, however, the highest lending total for a February since 2008 when gross lending reached £24.1 billion. ‘Lending continues the year on a positive note, with our monthly estimate showing an increase of 30% in February compared to a year ago. This growth rate is in line with what we saw in the closing months of 2015,’ said CML economist Mohammad Jamei. He explained that the recovery is being underpinned by market fundamentals in the UK, as wages grow and unemployment falls, helped by government schemes and competitive mortgage deals but the CML thinks it is unlikely that there will be any significant acceleration in lending. ‘While there may be a slight current boost to lending as some transactions seek to complete before the 01 April tax changes in the buy to let sector, this is likely to be followed by a slight fall in activity. Affordability pressures continue to weigh on activity, as does the low number of properties coming on the market, though this has been improving very recently,’ he added. Andy Knee, chief executive of LMS, believes that apart from a slight dip in activity expected following the April tax changes, all factors are working in the mortgage market’s favour. ‘Despite a delay in the base rate rise, the remortgage market in particular is likely to continue unabated, with home owners sitting on record housing equity and capitalising on the hugely competitive rates currently available,’ he pointed out. According to Peter Rollings, chief executive officer of Marsh & Parsons, once the April deadline passes it will quickly revert to business as usual, and a subsidence in buy to let borrowing will likely water down the growth in the mortgage market. ‘The Chancellor is certainly laying the long-term foundations for future mortgage lending levels, with the Lifetime ISA announcement just the latest guise to help first time buyers save up for a deposit and get onto the property ladder,’ he said. ‘But these savers are a long way down the pipeline, and in the immediate term, borrowing is more likely to feel the brunt of measures affecting the buy to let market. Property investors were completely overlooked in the Budget, and the Chancellor’s move to exclude landlords from the tax break on capital gains seems at odds with the need for greater supply of property on the market. Any measure that discourages and disincentives selling homes is not helpful in the current climate, and for buyers trying to keep track of house prices,’ he added. Continue reading
UK’s fledgling Build to Rent sector dealt stamp duty blow
The UK’s fledgling Build to Rent sector has been dealt a blow with the announcement that large investors will not be exempt from a new extra stamp duty surcharge that is introduced in a few weeks’ time. From 01 April there will be an extra 3% stamp duty payable on additional homes and it has been hoped that those investing in more than 15 properties would be exempt, and Chancellor George Osborne had indeed hinted at this. However, in his Budget announcement he confirmed that large scale investors in buy to let properties will pay the extra 3% which will apply equally to purchases by individuals and corporate investors. Melanie Leech, chief executive of the British Property Federation, said the move would hit the private rented sector. ‘The government’s decision to not include an exemption for investors who are purchasing large portfolios of properties for rent is extremely disappointing, and deals a huge blow to the build to rent sector,’ she pointed out. ‘This is going to be a significant deterrent to the institutional investment currently poised to settle in the purpose-built rented sector, which has the opportunity to deliver a significant number of new, quality affordable homes,’ she added. The failure to give relief from the additional stamp duty levy for large investors could inhibit the development of a much needed institutional private rented sector, according to Lucian Cook, Savills UK head of residential research. ‘While purchases of six or more residential properties can be treated as a non-residential transaction, the reform of stamp duty on commercial properties is likely mean greater entry costs for large scale residential investors one way or another. Our recent analysis suggests there will be demand for another one million private rented households in the next five years despite policies to boost home ownership,’ he explained. Investors could be put off, according to several experts, including Steve Sanham, development director at HUB. ‘A threshold on how many homes the stamp duty surcharge applies to is also crucial for institutional landlords and investors. The aim of delivering more homes will not be achieved if investors are put off from creating large developments of new homes to begin with,’ he said. Elizabeth Bradley, head of the corporate tax team at international law firm Berwin Leighton Paisner, also believes investors will be discouraged. ‘Much of the British property industry will be very disappointed with the Budget changes,’ she said. ‘The Chancellor has acknowledged the need to build more homes but the extension of the extra SDLT rate on buy to let to large investors will discourage investment in the private rented sector,’ she added. Continue reading
New stamp duty rates for commercial property in the UK announced
Investors in larger commercial property in the UK see a rise in stamp duty rates but buyers of smaller properties will benefit from a reduction in the tax payable. The way stamp duty on freehold commercial property and leasehold premium transactions is calculated has changed. The rates used to apply to the whole transaction value but from today (17 March) new tax rates and bands come into force. The new rates and tax bands are 0% for the portion of the transaction value up to £150,000, 2% between £150,001 and £250,000, and 5% above £250,000. It means that buyers of commercial property worth up to £1.05 million will pay less in stamp duty. Stamp duty rates for leasehold rent transactions will also change, with a new 2% stamp duty rate on leases with a net present value over £5 million. Opinion over the effect of the change is divided. According to the British Property Federation (BPF) it is not all good news. ‘Commercial property investment can often act as the catalyst for regional growth and as the economy has recovered investment has been spreading out from London to the UK’s regions, but will now undoubtedly slow,’ said Melanie Leech, BPF chief executive. ‘The real set back is that development in places like the Northern Powerhouse and Midlands’ Engine will now be held back as a result of this out of the blue raid on commercial property transactions,’ she explained. ‘Over a decade ago, the Government of that time decided to decouple the commercial and residential rates of SDLT recognising that the sectors were driven by very different factors and there was no logic in charging the same rates of SDLT on commercial and residential property. We can only hope that today’s announcement isn’t any unravelling of that logic,’ she added. However, Mark Tighe, managing director of capital allowances tax specialists Catax Solutions, believes that the reduced stamp duty payable will drive demand in this key asset class in the months and years ahead. But he warned that the resultant increase in transactions, among both businesses and private individuals buying commercial property, will potentially cost billions as a largely unused tax relief is lost forever. ‘Capital allowances are a highly valuable tax relief available to owners of commercial property but under current legislation they are irrecoverable if they are not identified and realised at the point of sale,’ he explained. ‘Currently, very few commercial property owners, along with their accountants and lawyers, are aware of unused capital allowances tax reliefs. Therefore as transaction levels increase in volume and momentum, commercial property owners are set to lose significant tax rebates to the tune of thousands, tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of pounds,’ he added. Continue reading
