Tag Archives: javascript
Soil Carbon Makes Biomass Calculations Even More Complicated
12 Jun 2013, 15:20 Robin Webster Managing forests so that wood can be burnt for energy could release large amount of carbon from the soil and increase greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new study. The government plans to ramp up the amount of power the country gets from bioenergy . In theory, generating electricity from plants, trees and crops can be carbon negative . But there’s a complicated argument going on about whether using wood to generate electricity might lead to more, or less, greenhouse gas emissions. Now, a new study from Dartmouth College has added to the controversy. It shows that harvesting forests more intensively disturbs the carbon in the soil – releasing more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. What is soil carbon? Forests are carbon stores. About a third of the world’s global soil carbon is stored in forest soil, and around half of that is in soil derived from minerals or rocks . Disturbing the soil could mean that the carbon is released into the air as carbon dioxide. But collecting measurements on mineral soil carbon is a labour-intensive process – which means there isn’t much data out there. As a result, many carbon monitoring systems assume that mineral soil carbon is not affected by the way a forest is managed. Assessing what happens to mineral soil carbon According to the new paper, published in the journal ofGlobal Change Biology-Bioenergy, this isn’t right. Reviewing a number of recent studies in North America, it says that harvesting and then replanting forests may lead to “significant and long-term carbon losses in the mineral soil”. In one case, a forest that was clear-cut and then replanted in Nova Scotia still showed a 50 per cent loss in mineral soil carbon 30 years later. Another study recorded a “significant” decline in mineral soil carbon eight years after a hardwood forest in the United States was cut down. Co-author Professor Andrew Friedland tells Eurekalert : “Our paper suggests the carbon in the mineral soil may change more rapidly, and result in increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide, as a result of disturbances such as logging … [it] suggests that increased reliance on wood may have the unintended effect of increasing the transfer of carbon from the mineral soil to the atmosphere. So the intended goal of reducing carbon in the atmosphere may not be met.” Some caveats There are some caveats. First, this is a complicated area. The studies reviewed don’t all agree about how much soil carbon is lost when a forest is cut down. The paper also concentrates on what happens when forests are chopped down and regrown – it doesn’t look in detail at what different sorts of forest management could mean. The biomass industry argues whole trees won’t be used as a source of bioenergy anyway. Instead, it says it will use by-products from forestry like sawdust, bark and smaller trees known as thinnings. The study doesn’t address what extracting these other products from the forest could mean for mineral soil carbon. But Friedland tells Carbon Brief: “…we can say that there are suggestions that each of these different forest removal approaches will have different implications for the amount of carbon that gets mineralised, or released, from the soil to the atmosphere”. What does it mean? The authors conclude: “This debate [on how to manage forests, and the use of wood for bioenergy] must include mineral soil carbon.” Including even a “moderate forest soil carbon loss” can have a significant impact on calculating whether burning wood to make bioenergy will lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, they conclude. The paper is clearly not the last word on the bioenergy debate – but it brings a new issue into what is already a pretty involved argument. In the future, a significant amount of wood burnt in UK power stations could come from North America – so how those forests are managed will matter. Continue reading
Site Potentials for Biomass Power Plants in Poland (Analyst Version)
DUBLIN, June 13, 2013 /PRNewswire/ — Research and Markets ( http://www.researcha…site_potentials ) has announced the addition of the “Site Potentials for Biomass Power Plants in Poland (Analyst Version)” report to their offering. (Logo: http://photos.prnews…20130307/600769 ) The Polish market for renewable energies has reached a turning point. The new Polish Act on Renewable Energy Sources entails new opportunities for developing biomass power plant projects including locations of the wood or furniture industry. At present, mono-incinerators at such locations produce less than five per cent of the Polish electricity from biomass. Most potentially favourable locations have not yet been developed. Instead, almost 80 per cent of the biomass electricity and more than a third of the renewable energies in Poland are generated through co-incinerating biomass in coal power plants. The new Polish Act on Renewable Energy Sources is scheduled to come into effect in the second half of 2013. According to this law, the support of co-incinerators should decrease significantly in the future. By contrast, smaller biomass power plants, mono-incinerators and electricity generation by using combined hear and power (CHP) technology should receive stronger support. At the same time, the goals in terms of developing and boosting renewable energies are once again increasing. In light of this development, experts have jointly analysed the market for electricity generation from solid biomass in detail. The report focuses on the identification of industrial locations that produce large amounts of biomass. The analyst version of the report Site Potentials for Biomass Power Plants in Poland includes: – A detailed analysis of the current and future legislation for promoting renewable energies and electricity generation from solid biomass in Poland. – An evaluation of the biomass streams that are currently being used as fuel in biomass power plants, including their amounts and sources. Key Topics Covered: Preface for the analyst version Preface Management Summary Part 1: Legislation and market 1 Country data 2 The electricity market in Poland 3 Renewable energy and CHP legislation 4 Current market Part 2: Solid biomass streams 5 Forest wood residues 6 Wood processing industry 7 Agricultural biomass 8 Recycling wood and landscape residues 9 Export / import Glossary Table of figures For more information visit http://www.researcha…site_potentials Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager. press@researchandmarkets.com U.S. Fax: +1-646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716 Sector: Environmental SOURCE Research and Markets Continue reading
Eight Ways To Solve World Hunger
Millions of people are starving, despite the world producing more than enough to feed everyone. What can we do about it? Alex Renton The Observer , Saturday 8 June 2013 It is estimated that extensive food trade with Africa means China will have no malnourished people by 2020. Photograph: How Hwee Young/EPA PREVENT LAND GRABBING An ugly side of current scares over future food supply is wealthy, land-poor states, like those in the Gulf and South Korea, acquiring tracts of undeveloped countries to use as allotments. It is a campaigning cause of the multi-charity IF campaign against hunger. Ethiopia, Sudan, Madagascar and Cambodia have been targeted and a total area the size of Spain may already have been acquired. Problem: Hard to police. Difficult to distinguish between genuine investment in Africa and the expropriation of land from the poor who need it to grow their food. Chances: 3/10 BLOCK THE SPECULATORS Photograph: Mario Tama/Getty Images[/color] Huge sums of investment fund money have flooded into the commodities markets since the financial crisis, looking for returns no longer available in equities. Automated trading systems that exploit tiny flaws in the market and encourage volatility make it impossible for traditional traders to keep prices stable and hedge against spikes. Problem: Much discussed in the G20 and G8, an international agreement on reforming and regulating the commodities markets looks no nearer than when the problem was first identified. Banks and investors have marshalled strong arguments against interference. Chances: 3/10 PRODUCE LESS BIOFUEL Photograph: Michael Wald/Alamy[/color] The pressure to achieve targets on reduced carbon emissions from fossil fuel has seen rich countries turning sugar, maize and other food crops into ethanol and biodiesel. Problems: Many economists doubt how important this issue really is in food price rises. Food and fuel prices are inextricably linked, so producing biofuel may lower food prices. A proportion of food crops have always been used for energy – 100 years ago 10% of the world’s grain went to feeding horses. Second-generation biofuels won’t use food crops, but wood, stalks and other waste. Chances: 1/10 STOP THE MEAT FEAST Photograph: Andrey Armyagov/Alamy Meat production is a wasteful use of the planet’s limited resources – even today, 40% of grain crops are going to feed livestock and fish. It is most inefficient with intensive beef farming , where it has been shown that just 2.5% of the feed given to cattle emerges as calories for our consumption. That is why the UN says agricultural production will have to rise 60% to feed the extra 2 billion mouths in 2050. Problems: There is no international mechanism to regulate or alter collective human diets, and no models other than famine that have ever worked. Chances: 0/10 SUPPORT SMALL FARMERS Photograph: AFP/Getty Images Most African farmers are less productive than a US farmer was 100 years ago. There is a consensus between NGOs and governments that supporting and training small farmers is the best possible solution to future food security . A combination of aid, education in low-tech methods such as better rice planting and irrigation, and the introduction of better seeds and fertilizer could spark a green revolution in Africa, such as the one that transformed South Asia in the 20th century. Problem: Rich countries have proved poor at delivering on their aid pledges. Genetically modified crops are already part of these schemes. Chances: 8/10 TARGET INFANT NUTRITION Photograph: Hoberman Collection/UIG via Getty Images “Eliminating malnutrition is achievable. It’s within our reach,” Bill Gates told the London summit, and many companies and rich nations are backing an African government-led plan to tackle it. Big improvements have already been made. The solution lies in education on good feeding techniques and getting the right nutrients to the mother and child from the beginning of pregnancy. Overall, malnutrition makes people poorer – it is responsible for an 11% decline in GDP in affected countries. Problem: Critics say it diverts policy makers’ attention from the job of solving the systemic problems in food supply. Chances: 9/10 ROLL OUT BIOTECH Photograph: Wayne Hutchinson/Alamy Huge gains could be available for health and agricultural productivity if the promises of genetic modification can be believed. Gene-splicing crops to help them withstand drought and flood may be vital. Pigs and chickens could have their digestive systems altered so that they eat food not required by humans, and pollute the environment less. Problem: There are risks with the technology, and no satisfactory regulatory system in place. Public distaste at the idea of GM, especially in Europe, is holding up research and stopping investment. Safer ideas, like stem cell meat fed on algae, are still far from production. Chances: 6/10 REDUCE POVERTY Economic growth has long been seen as the key to reducing hunger. More trade, financial liberalisation and open markets should aid the flow of food, of which there’s no overall shortage. Successful poverty reduction in China has led some economists to predict there will be no more hungry people there by 2020. Problems: Not easy to organise, with the west in economic recession and aid spending falling. More importantly, economic growth does not necessarily trickle down to the hungry poor.Child malnutrition has increased in India during the past decade despite the country’s boom. Chances: 2/10 Continue reading




