Tag Archives: investment
North West of England worse hit by negative equity values in UK
Hundreds of thousands of home owners in the UK who bought property in 2007 are still likely to be stuck in negative equity despite the current strong growth in the residential market. Almost 1.5 million property transactions were completed in 2007 when property prices reached peak levels, just before the financial markets imploded in 2008 and according to research from online estate agent HouseSimple, average property prices 53% of towns and cities are still below average prices in 2007. While average London prices have risen by 56% since 2007, that is not the case across large parts of the country, particularly in the North of England where 17 of the 20 towns and cities worst hit by negative equity are located. The research, which looked at 75 major towns and cities in England and Wales, also shows that it is the North West that has been worst hit by post-recession negative equity with 40% of the top 20 negative equity towns and cities in the region. The worst affected towns are Blackpool and Middlesbrough, where house prices are still almost 30% lower than pre-crash highs. Along with Blackpool, Blackburn and Liverpool are both in the top five worst affected towns and cities, with average house prices still 25% and 23% lower respectively than before the crash. Yorkshire and the Humber has also been hit hard, with a quarter of towns in the top 20 list in that region. Average prices in Middlesbrough are still 28% below pre-2008 levels, while in Bradford and Hull, house prices are 20% and 19% lower than 2007 averages. House price recovery in the South has been much stronger than the north. As you might expect, London’s house prices have more than recovered, and average prices today are almost £200,000 higher than 2007 levels. Property prices in Winchester also seem to be recession proof, up 44% to £447,046, compared to average 2007 prices. Meanwhile, average prices in the commuter town of Stevenage are 39% higher than pre-recession values. Sale and Stockport in the North West, where house prices now average £252,203 and £206,368 respectively at 25% and 22% more than 2007, buck the trend in the region. They are the only towns outside the South of England in the top 20 towns and cities where house prices have more than recovered to pre-recession levels. ‘London home owners have watched as their properties have risen in value substantially since 2008 but, thousands of people around the country have had to put their lives on hold, unable to move because they are trapped in negative equity,’ said HouseSimple chief executive officer Alex Gosling. ‘Unfortunately, the North of England has been slower to recover losses suffered during and after 2008. And anyone wanting to relocate for work or family reasons faces a less than appealing choice, either making a loss on the sale of their property or staying put and waiting until the price of their house at least recovers to… Continue reading
US existing home sales bounce back after unexpected decline
Sales of existing homes in the United States bounced back in March with big gains in the Northeast and Midwest, according to the latest index data to be published. Total existing sales, which are completed transactions that include single family homes, town homes, condominiums and co-ops, increased by 5.1% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.33 million in March from a downwardly revised 5.07 million in February. The data from the National Association of Realtors also shows that overall sales rose in all four major regions last month and were up 1.5% compared with March 2015. Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist said the rebound was welcome after an uncharacteristically large decline in February. ‘Closings came back in force last month as a greater number of buyers, mostly in the Northeast and Midwest, overcame depressed inventory levels and steady price growth to close on a home,’ he explained. ‘Buyer demand remains sturdy in most areas this spring and the mid-priced market is doing quite well. However, sales are softer both at the very low and very high ends of the market because of supply limitations and affordability pressures,’ he added. The index also shows that the median existing home price for all housing types in March was $222,700, up 5.7% from March 2015 when it was $210,700. March's price increase marks the 49th consecutive month of year on year gains. Total housing inventory at the end of March increased 5.9% to 1.98 million existing homes available for sale, but is still 1.5% lower than a year ago when it was 2.01 million. Unsold inventory is at a 4.5 month supply at the current sales pace, up from 4.4 months in February. ‘The choppiness in sales activity so far this year is directly related to the unevenness in the rate of new listings coming onto the market to replace what is, for the most part, being sold rather quickly,’ said Yun. ‘Additionally, a segment of would be buyers at the upper end of the market appear to have been spooked by January's stock market correction,’ he explained. Matching the lowest share since August 2015, properties typically stayed on the market for 47 days in March, a decrease from 59 days in February and below the 52 days in March 2015. Short sales were on the market the longest at a median of 120 days in March, while foreclosures sold in 50 days and non-distressed homes took 46 days. Some 42% of homes sold in March were on the market for less than a month, the highest since July 2015 when it was 43%. The data also shows that the share of first time buyers was 30% in March, unchanged both from February and a year ago. First time buyers in all of 2015 also represented an average of 30%. ‘With rents steadily rising and average fixed rates well below 4%, qualified first time buyers should be more active participants than what they are right now. Unfortunately,… Continue reading
Survey reveals many home owners support additional home stamp duty charge
Twice as many home owners in the UK support the new 3% stamp duty surcharge on additional homes as oppose it, despite loud opposition from landlord groups, new research shows. Some 47% support the extra charge which was introduced on second homes and buy to let properties on 01 April while 18% are against it and believe that it supports first time buyers. The results of the poll, conducted by YouGov for the HomeOwners Alliance and BLP Insurance shows that overall concerns about stamp duty have fallen dramatically since the reforms in 2014. In 2014, some 64% of UK adults believed that stamp duty was a serious problem but in 2016 that has fallen to 52%. Supporters of the stamp duty surcharge on second homes believe the measures are a good way to level the playing field between those buying a home to live in and those making an investment purchase. ‘The buy to let market is slowly destroying the overall housing market and making affordable properties less available for those wanting to own a home as their principal place of residence,’ said one survey respondent. The research also found that some feel there has been a shortage of homes available for first time buyers and this will make it harder for buy to let investors competing to purchase similar properties. Indeed it found that there are some anti buy to let feelings, a sense that buy to let may have been inflating house prices and pricing out local residents in some areas. Some also feel that those able to afford to buy a second home or to buy a property for the purpose of letting it out and making profit should be able to afford to pay higher stamp duty on their purchase. Those who oppose the stamp duty surcharge on second homes suggest the policy could have unintended consequences such as the surcharge being passed on to tenants in the form of higher rent. Comments also indicate that they feel the government is making another tax grab or that the policy is anti-enterprise. ‘I have been saving for five years to be able to afford to purchase an investment property. This change has now meant that it is not feasible for me to do so. It is unfair to penalise people who work hard and save,’ said another respondent. Paula Higgins, chief executive of the HomeOwners Alliance, thinks that the British public believe that homes are for living in and not speculating with. ‘The stamp duty surcharge might be bad for landlords but it will allow more young people to realise their dream of owning the roof over their head,’ she said. ‘This is why we initially called for the tax system to differentiate between aspiring homeowners and property investors. However, we must see the money raised ploughed back into building more affordable housing,’ she added. According to Kim Vernau, chief… Continue reading
