Tag Archives: chat
China’s Food Demand Grows
China’s food demand grows Dow Jones Newswires 05/30/2013 @ 10:37am China’s rising hunger is driving ever-larger acquisitions of global food assets as the shifting dietary profile of the world’s most populous nation increasingly puts meat, dairy and processed-food producers into play. Underscoring the trend, China’s Shuanghui International Holdings Ltd. on Wednesday said it agreed to acquire Smithfield Foods Inc. (SFD) of the U.S. for $4.7 billion, aiming to secure more pork for Chinese markets. The proposal is the largest in more than a decade of Chinese ventures to snap up food companies abroad. Other purchases have included state-owned Cofco Corp. buying Australian sugar producer Tully Sugar Ltd. last year for about $140 million, and Shanghai-based Bright Food (Group) Co.’s 2011 purchase of Manassen Foods Australia Pty. Ltd. for an estimated $522 million including debt. Bright Food said last year it would acquire control of U.K. cereal maker Weetabix Food Co. The purchases are part of a broader effort by Beijing to secure the raw materials needed to feed its fast-growing economy. Chinese state-controlled companies in recent years have struck big energy and mining deals. But many of the country’s food investments have had lower profiles. Shuanghui’s bid for Smithfield, the world’s largest hog farmer and pork processor, signals that not just any dish will do. As China grows more wealthy, relatively expensive protein is becoming a bigger portion of the domestic diet. China’s meat consumption would still need to rise about 8% from last year’s level just to catch up to South Korea’s, according to the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization. “It is part of the broad Chinese strategy to invest the country’s current-account surplus into strategically important commodities. And going forward, more transnational acquisitions are possible in meat and dairy,” said Paul Deane, the senior agricultural economist at Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. (ANZBY, ANZ.AU, ANZ.NZ). Cofco Chairman Ning Gaoning told reporters in March that his company is seeking acquisitions and investment opportunities in more consumer brands in the U.S., Australia and Brazil, suggesting that as Chinese palates get more adventurous, the door will open for imports of more premium foods. Australia may be a favored destination given its resources, Mr. Deane said. Chinese investment in Australia and New Zealand food and agribusiness targets has totaled $1.1 billion since 1995, according to research firm Dealogic. Beef may be a prime target for Chinese buyers, said Rabobank analyst Chenjun Pan. Chinese beef consumption has been rising steadily, with domestic prices more than doubling since 2007, she said. The U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that China’s beef imports would rise to a record 175,000 metric tons this year. Industry data show that China imported about 61,000 tons last year. Milk and other dairy products would also make logical Chinese acquisitions, said Li Guoxiang, a researcher at the state-backed Rural Development Institute of the China Academy of Social Sciences. “If we only rely on domestic resources to develop the animal-husbandry industry, China’s grain production will face challenges, and there will be more serious environmental pollution problems,” Mr. Li said. Relying on foreign resources may also assuage government concerns about having enough food, he said. As rising wealth collides with a string of scandals over tainted food in China, prospective acquirers could also shop for premium processed foods abroad, including olive oil and meat and dairy products, such as cheese and yogurt, Ms. Pan said. “The domestic market can’t convince consumers of food safety, so there’s a lot of space for such acquisitions.” -David Winning in Sydney, Sameer Mohindru in Singapore and Zhoudong Shangguan in Beijing contributed to this article. Write to Chuin-Wei Yap at Chuin-Wei.Yap@dowjones.com Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires (END) Dow Jones Newswires May 30, 2013 10:51 ET (14:51 GMT) Continue reading
Ukraine Poised For Global Ag Role
CHERYL TEVIS 06/11/2013 @ 7:22am Today’s announcement of the opening of DuPont Pioneer’s seed production facility in Stasi, Dykanka region, Poltava oblast, Ukraine, signals the region’s expanding stature as a growing agricultural economy and an emerging player in global food security. The $40 million investment will support the increasing demand for Pioneer brand maize, sunflower, and oilseed rape hybrids in Ukraine. Pioneer sales revenue in Ukraine has risen by 30% compounded annually between 2006 and 2011. Maize and sunflower unit volume sales have doubled in the same period. “Surely there is a deficit of quality seeds in Ukraine,” says Iurii Mykhailov, an ag economist who lives in Kiev, Ukraine. But he says that the DuPont Pioneer facility joins several other companies, including Syngenta, Monsanto, France’s Euralis, Germany’s KWS, and Maisadour, a French cooperative. Ukrainian companies Mais, Swargo, and West Trading Group also have their own seed plants. Mykhailov says that the Ukrainian infrastructure may require ramping up. He pegs the estimated production of corn in 2013/14 at about 22 million tons. “The current throughput of the Ukrainian grain export terminals is 40 million tons per annum,” he says. “The total storage capacity of elevators is 35 million tons. The new storage and export capacities must be doubled to accommodate the growing production.” He says corn is in demand since it’s used as a substitute for weather-damaged winter wheat crops. Ukraine currently exports about two-thirds of its corn. “There’s no sufficient demand for feed in Ukraine,” Mykhailov says. “The new seed facilities will help to improve the seed quality that in turn will help increase exports. Ukrainian corn is welcome in the Middle East and North African countries.” Mykhailov says that technological improvements also will play a critical role in Ukraine’s goal to double its grain production. “The main improvement can be achieved by increasing fertilizer usage, irrigation in the southern regions, and adequate machinery,” he says. He adds that other foreign countries are exploring the potential for investment, including Libya and China: China has invested in increasing Ukraine’s grain storage capacity. Continue reading
Senate Passes Half-Trillion Dollar Farm Bill; Ball’s In House’s Court
Posted: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:00 am | Updated: 9:24 am, Tue Jun 11, 2013. 0 comments WASHINGTON (AP) – The last time Congress passed a farm bill, Democrats had control of the House and the food stamp program was about half the size it is today. That was five years ago. Conservatives calling for an overhaul of the domestic food aid program will try to trim the nation’s nearly $80 billion grocery bill when the House weighs in on farm legislation in a few weeks. The Senate overwhelmingly voted Monday to expand farm subsidies and make small cuts to food stamps in a five-year, half-trillion dollar measure. But passage in the House isn’t expected to be so easy – or so bipartisan. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Monday that his chamber will take up its version of the farm bill later this month. He made clear his own dislike for generous farm subsidies included in the bill, saying his “concerns about our country’s farm programs are well-known.” But Boehner acknowledged that the rest of the chamber might not agree with him. “If you have ideas on how to make the bill better, bring them forward,” Boehner said in a statement directed to his colleagues. “Let’s have the debate, and let’s vote on them.” House consideration will come after more than a year’s delay. The Senate passed a similar version of its farmbill last year, but the House declined to take it up during an election year amid conflict over the amount to cut from food stamps, now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. One in seven Americans now use the program. The Senate bill would cut the food stamp program, now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, by about $400 million a year, or half a percent, and Senate Democrats have been reluctant to cut more. The farm bill approved by the House Agriculture Committee last month would cut the program by $2 billion a year, or a little more than 3 percent, and make it more difficult for some people to qualify. In his statement Monday, Boehner signaled support for the House bill’s level of food stamp cuts, saying they are changes that “both parties know are necessary.” Other Republicans are expected to offer amendments to expand the cuts, setting up a potentially even more difficult resolution with the Senate version. At the same time, Democrats are expected to try and eliminate the cuts. Food stamps were added to the farm bill decades ago to gain urban votes for the rural measure, which sets policy for farm subsidies, programs to protect environmentally sensitive land and other rural development projects. But with the program’s exponential growth during the recent economic downturn, food stamps are now making passage harder. “I expect it to come from all directions,” House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., said last month, acknowledging the complications of moving the bill through his chamber. On the Senate floor, senators rejected amendments on food stamp cuts, preserving the $400 million annual decrease. The bill’s farm-state supporters also fended off efforts to cut sugar, tobacco and other farmsupports. Senators looking to pare back subsidies did win one victory in the Senate, an amendment to reduce the government’s share of crop insurance premiums for farmers with adjusted gross incomes of more than $750,000. Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said their amendment would affect about 20,000 farmers. Currently the government pays for an average 62 percent of crop insurance premiums and also subsidizes the companies that sell the insurance. The overall bill expands crop insurance for many crops and also creates a program to compensate farmers for smaller, or “shallow,” revenue losses before the paid insurance kicks in. The crop insurance expansion is likely to benefit Midwestern corn and soybean farmers, who use crop insurance more than other farmers. The bill would also boost subsidies for Southern rice and peanut farmers, lowering the threshold for those farms to receive government help. The help for rice and peanuts was not in last year’s bill but was added this year after the agriculture panel gained a new top Republican, Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran. Critics, including the former top Republican on the committee, Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts, said the new policy could guarantee that the rice and peanut farmers’ profits are average or above average. The House has similar provisions expanding crop insurance and rice and peanut subsidies. Dairy programs could also be contentious on the House floor. Both the Senate and House bills would overhaul dairy policy by creating a new insurance program for dairy producers, eliminating other dairy subsidies and price supports. The new policy includes a market stabilization program that could dictate production cuts when oversupply drives down prices. The program faced little opposition in the Senate but a similar overhaul in the House bill is expected to face resistance in that chamber, where Boehner last year called the new stabilization program “Soviet-style.” Boehner reiterated those concerns in his statement Monday, saying he will support an amendment on the floor to challenge the proposed policy. The Senate bill also would: Overhaul dairy policy by creating a new insurance program for dairy producers, eliminating other dairy subsidies and price supports. The new policy includes a market stabilization program that could dictate production cuts when oversupply drives down prices. The program faced little opposition in the Senate but a similar overhaul in the House bill is expected to face resistance in that chamber, where Boehner last year called the new stabilization program “Soviet-style.” He reiterated those concerns in his statement Monday, saying he will support an amendment on the floor to challenge the proposed policy. Make modest changes to the way international food aid is delivered, a much scaled-back version of an overhaul proposed by President Barack Obama earlier this year. Senators adopted an amendment that would slightly boost dollars to buy locally-grown food close to needy areas abroad. Currently, most food aid is grown in the United States and shipped to developing countries, an approach the Obama administration says is inefficient but that has support among farm-state members in Congress. Consolidate programs to protect environmentally-sensitive land and reduce spending on those programs. Expand Agriculture Department efforts to prevent illegal trafficking of food stamp benefits. Continue reading
