Tag Archives: articles

Global Interest In Gunns Sales

21 Oct, 2013 CAROLYN CUMMINS GLOBAL interest is being fielded for former parts of the greater Gunn’s estate – the AFPT and AFPT 2 timberland portfolios, which have been put on the market. Prospective buyers range from Australian pension funds to high net worth individual investors and overseas pension funds. A price tag of about $50 million was suggested for the 94 forestry products in the portfolio. The Tasmanian assets are being sold by CBRE Agribusiness on behalf of Peter Anderson and Shaun Fraser of McGrathNicol as “Joint and Several” receivers and managers of the Australian Forestry Plantations Trust (AFPT) and the Australian Forestry Plantations Trust No. 2 (AFPT 2). Gunns, based in Tasmania, was placed into voluntary administration in September last year after the ANZ-backed syndicate withdrew support for the forestry group’s recapitalisation. This also included the group’s long-running attempt to obtain approvals to develop a timber pulp mill at Bell Bay, estimated to cost $2.3 billion. The agent, David Smith, CBRE’s head of timberland transactions, said the sale campaign had already generated wide-ranging preliminary interest. Mr Smith said two portfolios were being offered for sale in one line or separately. They comprise 94 properties with a total of about 11,757 hectares of hardwood plantation across a total land title area of 21,777 hectares. In addition to the timberland assets, the portfolios include 17 residential houses as well as significant existing infrastructure in the form of an extensive network of internal and external roads. “We have already fielded inquiries from domestic pension funds and institutions, local farmers, high net worth investors, offshore institutions and even an international pulp mill owner interested in future fibre security,” Mr Smith said. “The portfolio has generated interest from a biomass perspective, from parties looking at the potential future supply for production of biofuels, as well as from prospective purchasers considering the managed conversion of the land back to various forms of agriculture.” Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Global Interest In Gunns Sales

Is Farmland A Sound Investment?

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2f160f5e-ce9f-11e2-8e16-00144feab7de.html#ixzz2hyPlkVqB By Lucy Warwick-Ching Cow©Robert Thompson I inherited a substantial amount of money recently and have always dreamed of owning some land in the country. Everything I read seems to tell me that farmland is a sound investment, but are there any additional tax benefits to be gained by investing in it? Andrew Arnott, partner in the landed estates and rural business group at wealth management group Saffrey Champness says farmland indeed continues to be a steady investment. The latest Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics) survey revealed that UK farmland now costs an average of £7,440 an acre, compared with £2,400 an acre in 2004. Rising values aside, the tax benefits available are another incentive. However, it is not as easy to claim these benefits as it once was – HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) wants to ensure that such benefits are only available to those actively farming the land, rather than to those aspiring to a farming lifestyle or seeking the benefits of a large house in a rural location. Such tax benefits include exemptions from inheritance tax (IHT) and capital gains tax (CGT) under certain circumstances, the ability to offset any losses from the farm against profits made elsewhere, and benefits by way of value added tax (VAT). IHT relief is available where the land has been farmed in person for at least two years, or where the land has been let to a tenant who has farmed it for seven years. Depending on the type of tenancy, IHT relief can be available at either 50 per cent or 100 per cent of the value of the land concerned. Where you qualify for 100 per cent relief, then assets such as land and buildings can be passed on to heirs free of any IHT liability, either during lifetime or upon death. There are specific stipulations covering cottages, their use and occupation, for them to qualify for exemption. There have been a number of prominent cases with regard to farmhouses and IHT, but a general rule is that the house must be “of a character appropriate”, and “proportionate” in size in relation to the area of the land. If it does not pass these tests then it is highly likely to fail should it be tested by the courts. HMRC has shown its enthusiasm to contest on a number of occasions – with varying degrees of success. Equestrian interests are not usually regarded as farming, and land or buildings to keep horses do not qualify for the same exemptions. With woodland, generally the trees will be exempt from IHT but the land not, although there may be the opportunity to claim business property relief (BPR) for it. While farmland is generally liable for CGT on disposal, there are reliefs available if disposed of as a business asset. For example, “hold-over relief” may be relevant where the farm is being passed on to the next generation, or “entrepreneur’s relief” if it is being sold to a third party. Rollover relief should also be available where farmland assets are disposed of and the proceeds invested in further farmland or buildings. Send your questions to: money@ft.com Forum Farmers are generally able to recover all the VAT they incur on business purchases and expenses, and farmland often offers useful security against bank lending. Add all that together and it certainly has a lot in its favour – although equally, it is definitely not an option for everyone. Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Is Farmland A Sound Investment?

Days May Be Numbered For Farmland Rush

1 of 1 By Henry A. Barrios / The Californian    “If you see land values going down, then I think that would open up opportunity for buying land and expanding what we do,” said Steve Murray, owner of Murray Family Farms, which grows some 200 varieties of crops on about 300 acres near Edison. This photo was taken in May 2013. BY JOHN COX Californian staff writer jcox@bakersfield.com Concerns are rising in Kern County’s agricultural community that a looming interest rate hike could halt California’s farming boom. The overriding worry is that the Federal Reserve’s plans to wean the economy off low interest rates will drive up borrowing costs and, as a result, strengthen the U.S. dollar. If that happens, and many economists expect it will, it would make California ag exports more expensive overseas. But considering how quickly Kern’s farmland values have climbed since the start of the recession — between 33 percent and 74 percent, depending on the location, water access and crop — county property tax revenues would probably take a hit over the next few years. On the other hand, lower ag land prices could make it easier for farmers to expand their operations — providing they’ve saved enough money and not gone too deeply in debt. “If you see land values going down, then I think that would open up opportunity for buying land and expanding what we do,” said Steve Murray, owner of Murray Family Farms, which grows some 200 varieties of crops on about 300 acres near Edison. DECLINES AHEAD BUT NO CRASH? A report last month by ag lender Rabobank predicted that Central U.S. farmland values will drop by as much as a fifth during the next three years. It forecast lower prices for Midwestern staples like corn and soybeans, which have seen small declines this year. The Western United States will see a more moderate decline in ag land prices, the report said, because of the region’s greater crop diversity compared with the Midwest and closer proximity to urban areas. What there won’t be is a 1980s-style collapse in U.S. land values, or anything resembling the bursting of a bubble, Rabobank’s report emphasized. “I personally don’t use the term ‘bubble,'” said Vernon Crowder, a senior analyst with Rabobank International’s Food & Agribusiness Research and Advisory group, which prepared the report. He explained that the farmland price increases of recent years have been well supported by farmers’ earnings, which wasn’t the case in the 1980s. Still, the “B” word has come up as outside investors turned to farmland as a good place for their money during the recession. Rabobank and others have noted a sharp increase in investor land purchases, even as they agree that the majority of acquisitions have been by agricultural interests. Other trends back the idea that a sharp, broad-based downturn in farmland value is unlikely: Many farmland purchases made since 2009 were done in cash, so there is less debt to be serviced if interest rates jump. Also, some of the most expensive ag property includes water rights, which is expected to have long-term value as Southern California — and its thirst — continues to grow. IMPACT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT Kern’s rising farmland values have led to higher property taxes on the county’s so-called Williamson Act properties, which generally encompass the county’s farmland. Such acreage is now valued at about $3.8 billion — a 52 percent increase since 2010 that translates to an additional $13 million a year for local schools, cities, special districts and county government, Kern County Assessor-Recorder Jim Fitch said. While he declined to speculate about future farmland values, Fitch emphasized that his office bases assessments of such property primarily according to how much the land earns, or would earn, in rental prices. “The commodities are doing very well, and so we have seen rents increase a great deal,” leading to higher valuations and property tax revenues, he said. Rabobank’s Crowder pointed to strengths and potential weaknesses for certain crops popular among local farmers. Pistachios prices, he said, depend largely on demand from Asia. Kern County farmers heavily invested in the nuts could have a hard time finding a market if that overseas market were to shrink, he said. He was more bullish about another crop that has seen increased local acreage: mandarins. Even in the face of a heightened threat from the Asian citrus psyllid pest, Crowder said growing domestic demand has improved the fruit’s prospects. “The consumer really likes the product,” he said. He cautioned that there could be a concern if mandarins end up cutting into demand for navel oranges, which also take up significant amounts of local acreage. DECISIONS AHEAD At this point, more people are still looking to buy farmland than there are plots for sale, and it’s this imbalance that has kept prices strong, said farm and ranch broker Robb Stewart, an accredited farm manager with Pearson Realty in Bakersfield. He and Kern County Farm Bureau Executive Director Benjamin McFarland said there is a growing recognition among local farmers that things could soon shift in favor of buyers with money to spend. Assuming interest rates do rise, what happens next will depend on individual farmers’ financial situation, they said. Those who need to borrow will have a harder time, while people with cash on hand will find bargains. Also, Stewart said farmers who took on loans with variable interest rates to buy their land are talking lately about locking in those rates as a preventative measure. “I don’t know whether they’re doing it, but they talk about it,” he said. McFarland said that although the situation may appear delicate from the outside, farmers are used to changing business conditions. “We adapt. This is what we do,” he said. “We can’t control everything and we have to make the best decision for our business, our family business, to make sure that we keep moving forward.” Continue reading

Posted on by tsiadmin | Posted in Investment, investments, News, Property, Taylor Scott International, TSI, Uk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Days May Be Numbered For Farmland Rush