News
UK home lending weaker than a year ago, latest data shows
Lending for homes in the UK in April was weaker compared to a year ago but remained steady month on month, according to the latest data from the Council of Mortgage Lenders. verall gross lending in April was £15.8 billion, down from £16.1 billion in March and £16.8 billion in April last year. First time buyers saw a decline in lending compared to March and April last year although loan sizes for this sector have increased since a year ago. The CML says that competitive mortgage rates mean first time buyers are paying less to service their mortgage than any time since it began tracking this in 2005. Home mover lending volumes went up slightly month on month but there was a decline compared to April last year. The average home mover loan size decreased in April compared to March, but increased compared to the same period last year. Home owner remortgage activity also declined compared to last year and on a month to month basis. It has remained relatively subdued since around 2009. Lending for buy to let in April saw a decline compared to March, but there was substantial growth compared to levels in April last year. The CML says this was largely due to the increased levels of remortgage activity in the buy to let sector seen since the beginning of the year. The composition of lending for buy to let is different compared to that of home owner lending. While over the past year about 30% of lending to home owners was for remortgage, in the buy to let market 52% of lending was for remortgage. ‘House purchase lending in April was relatively subdued compared to last year, but similar to activity in March,’ said Paul Smee, director general of the CML, ‘The economy is recovering, with employment up, earnings growing, and competitive mortgage rates, so we expect activity to continue building as the year progresses. Buy to let is showing stronger growth than home-owner lending, buoyed significantly by remortgaging, which continues to remain more subdued in the home owner market,’ he added. Continue reading
British landlords urged to check tenancy deposits ahead of June deadline
Landlords in the UK have until later in June to comply with new legislation on tenancy deposits which clears up confusion created by a loophole in the law. Tenancy Deposit Protection schemes have been in place since 06 April 2007 but a court ruling said that any tenancy which began before that date but was renewed or became a statutory periodic after that date was deemed to be a new tenancy and therefore the deposit had to be re-protected. This created confusion as legally deposits that had been correctly protected suddenly became unlawful. This has now been addressed by the Deregulation Act 2015 which came into force in March requiring all landlords to comply by 23 June so that all tenancies are protected under one of the government authorised schemes. For deposits taken before the 06 April 2007 and where the tenancy became periodic prior to this date, landlords and agents aren’t required to protect the deposit however, they won’t be able to serve a section 21 notice to regain possession of the property unless the deposit is protected with a tenancy deposit scheme. The Association of Residential Agents (ARLA) is urging all landlords to check that they comply with the regulations before the deadline. If landlords fail to comply they could be liable for sanctions which include a potential claim by the tenant for compensation of up to three times the amount of the deposit paid and find themselves unable to bring a tenancy to an end through a Section 21 notice. The protection of tenant deposits is always a hot topic in the private rented market and something that often causes the greatest amount of disagreement between tenants and landlords. Following a number of high profile court cases where landlords have been challenged by tenants for up to three times the deposit amount and on the enforcement of notices to quit, there is now greater clarity on what landlords should and should not do. ‘The new Act provides clarity on the tenancy deposit protection regulations in practice, especially with regard to whether the pre 06 April 2007 deposits fall under the protection rules. The onus is on landlords to adhere to the new rules and ensure they’re compliant,’ said Fran Mulhall, regional operations manager at property rental specialists GFW Letting. ‘I think the deposit protection ruling from the Act can only be seen as a positive change, however I think there is a danger of detrimental effects that the Act might unintentionally encourage, relating specifically to the Section 21 notice to quit. The Deregulation Act has altered the rules regarding serving notice to quit, namely the timing in which the notice can be served and the period of notice required to be given to the tenant,’ Mulhall pointed out. ‘Landlords who had been served with a local authority improvement notice for failing to carry out repairs requested by the tenant within a timeframe could fall foul to the… Continue reading
Canadian property sales up for fourth month in a row
Nationally home sales in Canada have increased for the fourth month in a row, up 3.1% from April to May and prices are up 8.1% year on year. Actual, not seasonally adjusted, activity is now 2.7% above May 2014 levels although the he number of newly listed homes was little changed from April to May, according to the latest index data from the Canadian Real Estate Association. CREA said that the Canadian housing market remains balanced overall put national figures are being skewed by exceptional prices in Greater Vancouver and Greater Toronto. If these are excluded than the year on year price increase is just 2.4%. The data shows that national sales activity is at its highest level in more than five years and transactions were up from the previous month in about 60% of all local markets, led by increases in the Greater Toronto Area, Calgary, Edmonton, Ottawa and Montreal. One factor that could be responsible for the sales growth, however, is that “mortgage default insurance premiums increased at the beginning of June and this may have encouraged buyers to complete in May top beat the rise. Year on year price growth accelerated in May in all home categories tracked by the index with the exception of one storey single family homes. Two storey single family homes continue to post the biggest year on year price gains with a rise of 7.18% while the price of one storey single family homes increased by 4.11%, townhouse/row units by 4.09% and apartments by 2.91%. Annual price growth varied among housing markets tracked by the index. Greater Vancouver saw the biggest rise at 9.41% followed by Greater Toronto at 8.9%. Fraser Valley, Victoria, and Vancouver Island all recorded year on year gains of about 4% in May. The data also shows that price gains in Calgary continued to slow, with a year on year increase of just 1.21% in May. This was the smallest gain in more than three years and the eleventh consecutive monthly slowdown in year on year price growth. Elsewhere, prices held steady in Saskatoon and Ottawa, rose slightly in Greater Montreal and fell by about 3% in Regina and Greater Moncton. CREA chief economist Gregory Klump pointed out that sales in and around the Greater Toronto area played a major role in the monthly increase in May sales. ‘At the same time, the rebound in sales over the past few months in Calgary and Edmonton suggests that heightened uncertainty among some home buyers in these housing markets may be easing,’ he said. The number of newly listed homes was virtually unchanged, down 0.2% in May compared to April. The CREA report says that this reflects an even split between housing markets where new listings rose and where they fell, with little monthly change for new listings in most of Canada’s largest and most active urban markets. The national sales to new listings ratio was 57.6% in May, up from a low… Continue reading
